Mark Walush returns to review the Alaskan catastrophe from yesterday:
Final Score: Alaska-Anchorage 71 Drexel 65
Final Score: Alaska-Anchorage 71 Drexel 65
Player of the Game: Sammy Mojica
Key to the Game: Defense
Next Game: Today, 4pm EST vs San Diego
There is so much that can be said about this game that is
covered in the first line of this post.
But for now, we will focus on the positives. For the second game in a row, fans saw a solid performance from Sammy Mojica, who went off for 20 points on an efficient 15 shots and 3-4 shooting from the line, while also chipping
in 6 rebounds and 6 assists with only 2 turnovers. Sammy’s resurgence comes as a bright spot
compared to his early play which left a lot to be desired that invoked fears of a sophomore slump year. This game showed those flashes of
explosiveness that the coaches saw last year and hoped would infuse this team.
Offensively, Drexel shot 38.3% inside the arc, 40% from 3,
and only 50% from the line. The also
outrebounded UAA by 11 and had 9 blocks. Drexel also assisted on 75% of their shots,
showing an emphasis on moving the ball and players getting the ball to the open
man instead of trying to force bad shots.
Unfortunately, that is about all of the good that can be said
about this game. For the second straight
game, Drexel spotted their opponent a 10 point head start, had a furious
comeback to get close or lead by halftime, only to see that lead evaporate
after halftime never to get close again.
Drexel turned the ball over 13 times, committed 27 fouls to UAA’s 19,
and only averaged a meager 0.96 points per possession. The 4-big rotation was completely shut down,
shooting a combined 4-14 against a team that they had a ton of size on.
Talent is not the issue in this case, as I believe that this
team has the talent and ability to win in the CAA.
However, they are typically only performing to their potential on the
offensive end, and basketball is a two-way sport. Oddly enough, the defensive end has been the
demise of the team this season, and even more surprising, is how bad the D has
actually been.
The worst stat of the night is that the Dragons gave up over
1 point per possession, something they have done in every game this year. The 1.04 ppp mark is actually the lowest mark the
Dragons have conceded this season, but still ranks well above the D-1 average
for defensive efficiency. For a team and
coach that used to pride itself on defense, take a look at defensive ranks
since the 2002 season, when Bruiser took over as Drexel’s head coach:
Year
|
Kenpom
Defensive Efficiency Ranking
|
2002
|
235
|
2003
|
46
|
2004
|
152
|
2005
|
135
|
2006
|
14
|
2007
|
14
|
2008
|
76
|
2009
|
40
|
2010
|
82
|
2011
|
12
|
2012
|
62
|
2013
|
153
|
2014
|
105
|
2015
|
216
|
2016 (as of 11/28/15)
|
272
|
Drexel has consistently fielded one of the better defensive
teams in the country for the better part of the last decade, except for the past 2
years. This has also coincided with the
new rule changes enforced by the NCAA. Since
Bruiser’s teams have always been physical, grind it out, beat your nose in
defensive teams, these new rules emphasizing freedom of motion and cracking
down on arm bars and hand placement of offensive players, something that was a
staple of the Drexel defenses of legend.
The question now is, if defense was the glue holding this team together,
how do they play Bruiser’s style within these new rules?
All of the statistics aside, losing to a Division II school
is unacceptable, no matter the circumstances.
Losing 2 games in as many seasons to Division II schools? That is enough
to cost many coaches their jobs.
Unfortunately, the small, diminishing following that Drexel basketball
has, was not surprised at that result of this game, with some even commenting
that they would actually be more surprised if Drexel won this game. That shows signs of greater program problems
than can be discussed in this space, and a growing number of people see the
only relief is a total change in program culture, which of course needs to
start at the top of the food chain.
Unfortunately, we have seen this song and dance before and it looks like
there is no end in sight.
No comments:
Post a Comment